Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 in hard rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2007 in hard rock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Series of unmaintained pages with an unspecific genre. Just how hard is "hard rock" anyway? Why call the page "hard rock" when the intro says "Covers everything from Progressive Rock, Hard Rock, Glam/Sleaze Metal, Punk Rock and just good old honest Rock." Overly specific genre hairsplitting, redundant to 2007 in music onward. Note that no pages were made for 2013 or 2014, none of these pages are linked from anywhere, and "2006 in hard rock" redirects to 2007 in heavy metal music. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seems to be borderline indiscriminate with the loose inclusion criteria. I was going to suggest that maybe it could be cleaned up in normal editing, but then I checked some of the articles, and they have an extreme reliance on one guy's fansite, which does not look like a reliable source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.