Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Espinar bus crash (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 14:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Espinar bus crash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Causing deaths and being reported in the news do not confer notability, and high-casualty bus crashes are common. Fails WP:EVENT. Per WP:NOPAGE, this is better covered at List of traffic collisions (2000–present) or Yauri, Peru. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 04:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Transportation, and Peru. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 04:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It hasn't even been a year since the last AfD. – Ike Lek (talk) 06:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Per WP:2MONTHS, If the XfD discussion was closed as “no consensus”, generally do not renominate the page for at least two months. Since the last discussion was closed as no consensus seven months ago, there is no problem with renominating the page for deletion. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 06:54, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete this depressingly routine bus crash article. Mangoe (talk) 23:25, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete agree that the notability concerns are still present and this fails to be notable in coverage. The fact that it "hasn't been a year" even since last AfD only shows that this should be put to rest for good and that nothing is changing to enhance the notability of the article. Iljhgtn (talk) 10:25, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.