Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Fort Lee High School Transcript Scandal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fort Lee High School . Consensus seems to be Merge; a redirect will be need for the GFDL. DGG ( talk ) 02:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Fort Lee High School Transcript Scandal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NOT#NEWS Ironholds (talk) 00:39, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable local news story. TJ Spyke 03:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not your local, small town newspaper Reso lute 03:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't satisfy WP:Notability and violates WP:NOT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artemis84 (talk • contribs) 05:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable local news. Joe Chill (talk) 14:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed to merge per the three !votes below. Joe Chill (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Fort Lee High School. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Fort Lee High School obviously. Sourced, and further sources are available. None of the above delete comments explain why they have dismissed the merge option. Even if the page is deleted, a sourced account on the controversy can be added to the school article as an editorial matter so I don't see why we are here. TerriersFan (talk) 20:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —TerriersFan (talk) 20:36, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect, per TerriersFan, rather than rewrite it from scratch. This content is not inappropriate for the main article. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:41, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as proposed. This is a perfect example of content that is worth including in the encyclopedia, but does not merit its own article. However, some rewriting is needed even with a merge -- the current version of the article would not receive a good grade in an English class. --Orlady (talk) 21:19, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.