Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 plane crash in Washington
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Keeper | 76 14:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- 2013 plane crash in Washington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:AIRCRASH. While tragic, military crashes are quite common. Nobody notable killed. WP:NOTNEWS also applies.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William 12:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ...William 12:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William 12:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. ...William 12:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC) ...William 12:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sad but military aircraft accidents are rarely notable, nothing big hit and nobody notable killed. MilborneOne (talk) 12:17, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails all notability standards. Sad but, alas, these things happen. - The Bushranger One ping only 12:27, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: but list in List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft (2000–present) per WP:AIRCRASH. Toddst1 (talk) 13:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is only necessary to consider how many military aircraft losses (not to mention ships, land vehicles etc) there have been since the beginning to realise that this is not the place for an article on each one. --AJHingston (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Absolutely no reason to keep. Ducknish (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NOTDIARY applies to all the recent articles started by the creator.--Jetstreamer Talk 12:30, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.