Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Balochistan attack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is to keep but there is no consensus on examining if this will gain more coverage in the future. Discussion about the title belongs on talk. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^ 08:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Balochistan attack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

2019 Balochistan attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn't merit a standalone article per WP:ROUTINE & WP:NOTNEWS. Two minor & seperate incidents were combined based on WP:OR to create this article. — Bukhari (Talk!) 08:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep "WP:ROUTINE & WP:NOTNEWS" would be decided later. While most incidents get coverage only for a single day, this incident is receiving coverage for at least 3 days now. At this moment it is rather clear that this incident is still receiving significant coverage.[1][2] We prefer what reliable sources say and since they combine "two minor & separate incidents", then we will keep doing the same. Shashank5988 (talk) 09:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per significant and continued coverage. Per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 13:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as has significant coverage in reliable sources and it is too early to judge for sustained coverage, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: Then please move "2019 Balochistan attack" to "2019 Balochistan attacks".— Bukhari (Talk!) 14:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Can't say that is accurate. In any case you can initiate an WP:RM if you want. Shashank5988 (talk) 19:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and remind both page creator and Nom of WP:RAPID.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and Speedy Close. Requesting speedy close so title decision making can proceed which is stalled pending the outcome of this discussion. --В²C ☎ 19:57, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.