Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 SL1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:14, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs for this article:
2020 SL1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable asteroid with no significant coverage nor scientific study whatsoever---fails WP:NASTRO. Searching on Google, Google Scholar, and NASA ADS gives no results that give it significant individual attention. Nrco0e (talkcontribs) 01:44, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since you (the deletion nominator) created these articles, I think it would be helpful if you explained what caused you to change your mind. Johnjbarton (talk) 02:28, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I didn't have a fully complete grasp of the notability guidelines for minor planets when I made these articles several years ago, and I admit I didn't really bother to check back. Right now I'm revisiting minor planet article stubs on Wikipedia and checking them for notability, so here I am nominating them for deletion. Nrco0e (talkcontribs) 03:19, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:05, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.