Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24 Hour Propane People (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

24 Hour Propane People

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to establish notability. The first AfD was a bulk nomination and the second AfD was speedy closed because of a temporary ArbCom injunction. --Explodicle (T/C) 19:28, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Individual TV Episodes need to be judged by whether they're independently notable. There's no sign that this one is memorable or groundbreaking or water cooler talk. I think that Wikipedia is shifting away from its "WP:POKEMON" way of thinking that prevailed in the old days, where people thought that every episode of every TV show ever made was "entitled" to its own article. Now that there are entertainment Wikis (Wikia), people can contribute to those all that they want to. Certainly, there are some King of the Hill episodes that stood out above the rest, but most of them would be on the bottom of a very large hill. Merge this one to the 10th season article, if it hasn't gone there already. The detailed "I-took-notes-while-I-watched-TV" plot summary can move over to King of the Hill Wiki. Mandsford (talk) 21:33, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no 10th season article, but there is a list of King of the Hill episodes that already contains a brief plot summary of each episode. I wouldn't be opposed to redirecting there, but merging would make this episode's entry much longer than the others. --Explodicle (T/C) 21:54, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Redirect to the appropriate page, per nom and Explodicle. Ray^Talk 19:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Ray^Talk 19:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.