- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Svartner (talk) 16:52, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 260 Huberta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet notability standards. We don't usually keep articles about individual asteroids unless there are studies about the object specifically. That is not the case here. Renerpho (talk) 22:38, 8 July 2025 (UTC) WP:WITHDRAWN per references presented below. This is probably a "speedy keep". Renerpho (talk) 17:21, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Renerpho (talk) 22:38, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: I found at least three papers discussing this asteroid without much difficulty. It doesn't appear to be non-notable. Praemonitus (talk) 01:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Praemonitus: Would you mind sharing the papers you've found? All I can find are papers about collections of Cybele asteroids. Those don't help. Renerpho (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Renerpho: Sure. There are two older papers on elements for 260 Huberta, the already cited Lagerkvist (2001) which includes a paragraph, Shevchenkoa et al (2021) which has at least two paragraphs,[1] Carruba et al (2015) which discusses the Huberta family with a couple of sentences on the primary asteroid,[2] and of course the entry in Schmadel (2012).[3] Praemonitus (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! The elements and the entry in Schmadel aren't sufficient (these exist for every asteroid). The others should be okay, specifically Carruba et al., to bring this above WP:GNG and WP:NASTRO. Renerpho (talk) 17:25, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Renerpho: Sure. There are two older papers on elements for 260 Huberta, the already cited Lagerkvist (2001) which includes a paragraph, Shevchenkoa et al (2021) which has at least two paragraphs,[1] Carruba et al (2015) which discusses the Huberta family with a couple of sentences on the primary asteroid,[2] and of course the entry in Schmadel (2012).[3] Praemonitus (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Praemonitus: Would you mind sharing the papers you've found? All I can find are papers about collections of Cybele asteroids. Those don't help. Renerpho (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep – Per Praemonitus. Svartner (talk) 05:14, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep appears to be notable, per HEY (wp). Once upon a daylight dreary (talk) 14:44, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.