Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/27th Special Operations Maintenance Squadron
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 27th Special Operations Maintenance Squadron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not see how a maintenance squadron can possibly be considered notable, and no sources to show otherwise. Prod was removed. DGG ( talk ) 03:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unit is not notable per WP:NOTABILITY and the developing MILHIST guidelines at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#Possible_addition_to_MILMOS. Anotherclown (talk) 11:40, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Anotherclown (talk) 11:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not notable as per nom. MilborneOne (talk) 12:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete any necessary data can be incorporated into 27th Special Operations Wing. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The Squadron has been decorated numerous times including the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award and the Meritorious Unit Award. This Squadron is notable, and it is a good candidate to be expanded into an excellent article. Inniverse (talk) 15:08, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.