Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2mm Pinfire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:33, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2mm Pinfire

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

2mm Pinfire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. So far, this article has one citation, and a quick citation search turned up very few/no sources. Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NPRODUCT as nothing was found regarding the subject that was significant. (Acer's Communication Receptacle | what did I do now) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here) 00:06, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:26, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Firearms. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:14, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the article has a single source, which doesn't exactly meet NPRODUCT's sustained coverage in reliable independent secondary sources requirement, and a specific model of ammunition cartridge with no extraordinary attributes doesn't have any reason to have an article. I would be open to merging into 2 mm caliber, but given its state I'm not going to propose that as my primary choice. --PixDeVl yell talk to me! 22:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The single source is not a reliable source. As mentioned by others, it fails the requirement for products. -- CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 03:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.