Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2nd Combat Weather Systems Squadron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 2nd Weather Group. Will perform merge. (non-admin closure) Vacation9 00:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Combat Weather Systems Squadron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This squadron is not notable enough given the guidelines at WP:MILUNIT and precedents such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/609th Air Communications Squadron, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/43d Aircraft Maintenance Squadron, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24th Transportation Battalion (United States). There's virtually no independent references to anything referencing with the unit besides USAF articles. I think the information in the article could be merged into the parent unit, the 2nd Weather Group, as a section explaining the squadron. Buckshot06 (talk) 19:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 15. Snotbot  t • c »  20:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Summarize, Merge, & Redirect to 2nd Weather Group; upmerge this to parent organization.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:40, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concur--Lineagegeek (talk) 22:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree— - dain- talk    03:00, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.