Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3CX Phone System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3CX Phone System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've already tried to clean up this article of MOS issues, but I really think that little info can be left without advertising-like tone, in my opinion. Jasper Deng (talk) 02:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 03:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Independent sources are provided and the article certainly doesn't read like advertising to me (at the very least, not very good advertising). I'll try to clean it up a bit more. Several Times (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Multiple reliable sources that show notability are already in the article. Joe Chill (talk) 12:37, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The question here is not notability, but the amount of advert-like info I found in the article before the cleanup by Several Times.Jasper Deng (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Many reliable noteworthy sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.251.108.121 (talk) 15:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's besides the point here.Jasper Deng (talk) 15:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's notable. It has been rewritten. AfD is not for cleanup. Joe Chill (talk) 17:15, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Covered in reliable sources. I will also note that I disagree with the assessment that the article read like an advert. If anything, it read more like a product manual complete with a section on configuring the product in earlier versions. -- Whpq (talk) 14:43, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.