- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 01:59, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 3D library (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spammy, unreferenced article that seems to be intended to promote a software portal site. Doesn't add anything worthwhile to what's already available at 3D modeling and related articles. Fails WP:RS and WP:CFORK andy (talk) 21:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —andy (talk) 21:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No references, no news hits, and general Google search leads to stuff unrelated. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 00:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Embodies the typical useless Wikipedia article. Provides no meaningful information, only vaguely related blather. Pcap ping 03:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Blather is a good word to describe it-- I've read this twice and still can't figure out it's talking about. An article that begins "The 3D libraries become a source of data" would seem to have been copied from the middle of something else, but if it is, I can't find it. Mandsford (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - appears to be a WP:COATRACK article for the external link. --Darkwind (talk) 22:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.