- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 3dwm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prodded, and some editors believe it should be speedied so I'm bring it here for a proper discussion. No claims to notability of the product, which doesn't appear to have gone anywhere. Only minor claim to notability in the article is pure conjecture. External link reference tells us nothing. Canterbury Tail talk 13:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, agreed. Unreleased software project whose chief claim to notability is being mentioned by Microsoft on a page that isn't chiefly about it. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom. Favonian (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.