Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3rd condition of equilibrium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 10:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3rd condition of equilibrium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible original research? No sources cited, no relevant JSTOR/Google hits, and as far as I can tell, doesn't appear to be actually correct (though that is my own OR). Generally of a quality to warrant a CSD, but doesn't fall under any of the CSD criteria. Writ Keeper (WK to move) ⚇♔ 18:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Also, the article 3rd condition of equlibrium(sic) has been created, deleted and recreated as a duplicate of this one, as well as Wikipedia:Editor review/nafees888‎. Writ Keeper (WK to move) ⚇♔ 18:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Already fully covered by mechanical equilibrium. At best a pointless neologism. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:56, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.