- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 4g wifi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No standard called "4g wifi" exists, and the term is not used in research papers. Mange01 (talk) 19:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 24. Snotbot t • c » 19:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete I can't find anything on this anywhere. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:30, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As WP:HOAX at best. That's really odd... I wonder what that person was thinking about when they created the article. §FreeRangeFrog 09:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This AFD was reopened after the speedy delete was contested, but the deleting admin also renominated the article at that time, so there are now two open AFDs, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4g wifi (2nd nomination) — Frankie (talk) 21:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as redundant with 4G (Does not appear to be hoax but rather an honest mistake by someone who doesn't realize that 4G and Wi-Fi are two different things.) —teb728 t c 23:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to 4G, which is what the content is about. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:02, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.