Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6G (cellular network)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

6G (cellular network)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a violation of WP:CRYSTAL to me. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 02:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete No cites, indefinite predictions.... Mangoe (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Delete - Given that 5G is far from confirmed as a standard, and that 4G is brand new, this fails WP:CRYSTAL regardless of the article. It possibly fails G2 of SPD, but this article is uncategorized, unreferenced, and contains very little information of any use. Lukeno94 (talk) 09:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and since we have no idea whether we will ever actually get to 5G, this is just speculation at present. — sparklism ^hey! 14:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:CRYSTAL. Unsubstantiated communication standard based on previous iterations, far WP:TOOSOON. Funny ^Pika! 14:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.