- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 10:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 6 Colors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable sources independent of the developers are given in the article or by a Google search, thereby meaning it fails WP:N. Una LagunaTalk 06:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - only reference was to a blog. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 10:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. Una LagunaTalk 09:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As there are no reliable sources cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. For those who voted for delete - try the game and change your mind. Pyvanet (talk) 00:42, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Having played the game and whether or not you enjoyed it has no effect on the notability of the game. Una LagunaTalk 06:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Abstain Vezaz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.148.60 (talk) 00:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:V and seems to be impossible to correct as this article fails a basic notability test as well. Randomran (talk) 16:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.