- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 7d Physics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, apparently unpublished physical theory. Only refs given for the so called theory are to the personal webpage of the author. TimothyRias (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - probably nonsense, definitely OR (despite the attempt to provide lots of references - but these are references for well known things like the Compton wavelength, not for 7d physics). Djr32 (talk) 16:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as pure WP:OR by the article creator. Google Scholar shows up just a single pdf file which does not mention 7d Physics. Salih (talk) 16:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pseudoscience\OR\Essay--Wadeperson (talk) 20:15, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Essentially OR and some redundant description of basic Kaluza-Klein ideas. The references are wikipedia pages, personal web sites, and unrelated canonical physics texts. Joshua Davis (talk) 04:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non notable, I wish it were even readable but it isn't. Dmcq (talk) 09:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. For a moment, I thought it was a fork of Heim Theory, but it has absolutely no references for the material other than what is contained in conventional partical physics. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. OR. Ozob (talk) 23:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - that page is a candidate for tranwiki import to wikiversity. --mikeu talk 12:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable subject, unsourced. Elucidate (light up) 18:47, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.