- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 08:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 90:00 Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete Not notable. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete references all point to their own website. Maybe one day they'll be mentioned somewhere else. Potatoswatter (talk) 22:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- prod'ed. Usually it's better to do that first. Potatoswatter (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. BlueValour (talk) 02:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails the general notability criteria (WP:N) as no reliable sources can be found to support the magazines notability. Atyndall93 | talk 08:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —BlueValour (talk) 21:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.