Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A&G Modes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As noted, that something has lots of Google hits is not evidence of notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A&G Modes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source searches are only providing passing mentions. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per quick google search! FertilityWizard (talk) 01:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Hi FertilityWizard: check out WP:LOTSOFGHITS. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment FertilityWizard is a new account whose posts consist mostly of "keep" votes in AfD discussions on baseless "#1 Google searches". sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 04:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 11:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c)  15:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a nn music distribution company; no sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The iVote by Special:Contributions/FertilityWizard] should probably be discounted, as per the comment above. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.