Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.L.X. (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:19, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A.L.X.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Recreated immediately after the previous AFD, although that nomination was based on this being a hoax, and wound up as an A7 speedy. I don't find any reason to believe this is a hoax, but there's no reason to think this is a notable person either. The entry as it stands now is simply a long exercise in name-dropping, but notability is not like a contagion that rubs off of one person onto another. This artist has two recordings, but one is unreleased, and the other doesn't seem to have a commerical release beyond an amazon download and sales at on-commission sites like CDBaby. No third party coverage that I can find. Hairhorn (talk) 23:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it appears as though this was undeleted, rather than recreated, if that makes a difference to anyone. It wasn't at all clear in the edit history. Hairhorn (talk) 00:11, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no solid sources. Article was undeleted after a promise to add sources, but the reliable-looking sources on the article have nothing to do with this guy. Nyttend (talk) 02:41, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:01, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not finding any in-depth coverage for this person in reliable sources independent of the subject; does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO. Gongshow ^Talk 19:41, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.