- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete, but not all that quickly. Slow & steady wins the race, eh? Remeber that CSD A1 refers to context, not content. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 08:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable website.. --Mysidia (talk) 02:50, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't look notable/encyclopaedic to me. --Daveb 04:08, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't meet WP:WEB - FrancisTyers 04:09, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. —Preost talk contribs 04:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Joel7687 09:05, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Quarl 11:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per non notable VegaDark 00:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable leaning towards advertisement --Pboyd04 00:14, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Stifle 02:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy per CSD reason number one. — MATHWIZ2020 TALK | CONTRIBS 01:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.