- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was RESULT. KEEP (Withdrawn nomination – Green Cardamom is completely right; I'm actually not sure what I was thinking.}}
- ACX.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Ad for non-notable company Prof. Squirrel (talk) 08:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep ACX is owned by Audible.com which is owned by Amazon.com and one could make a case of inherited notability. WP:INHERITED is allowed when appropriate, if this content did not exist here it would have to be tacked onto the Audible article and it makes more sense to split it off to a separate article. ACX is a significant and important part of the audiobook industry, an industry more than 50% controlled by Audible (Amazon). Further we do have some sources, [1][2][3][4][5][6].. plus more. To call this article an "ad" suggests it is POV and I am not seeing it, the prose is factual, pithy, and doesn't puff up the topic. However that is a content dispute better resolved on the article talk page and not at AfD. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 14:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.