- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- ACityDiscount (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Could not find significant coverage for this retailer. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:45, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete In addition to what Fetchcomms said the article is super promotional. Peter.C • talk 00:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Advertisement -- Nz101 - Talk :: Contribs 02:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete blatant advert, would qualify for speedy delete. LibStar (talk) 14:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.