- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ADP Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Extremely long and promotional article on non-notable record label. Prodded and speedied already. Blast Ulna (talk) 13:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom and no notable artists and no meaningful incoming links. Lugnuts (talk) 17:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well what do you expect it's a DIY/indie record label and there's a bunch of articles of DIY labels on Wikipedia why start deleting this one while the others are non-notable as well. How can it be no notable artists when these guys have their albums selling in FYE, you need UPC barcodes for proof? lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.133.41.79 (talk • contribs)
- Delete, no attribution of notability of this label to independent sources. --Dhartung | Talk 21:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, lack of coverage in sources, no articles exist about any of the artists so no evidence any of them are notable either. --Snigbrook (talk) 21:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.