Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AHT Cooling Systems
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure). As a German speaker, I found this, so yes it did indeed win the award, which reasonably clear consensus discusses that this demonstrates notability. WilliamH (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- AHT Cooling Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
It fails WP:corp, Most relevant information must be found article also reads like an ad Oo7565 (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep If AHT really did win a European ProCool award, I'd say that's decent enough notability. Hopefully a user fluent in German can help us out here. GlassCobra 01:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep see above. It seems to be a valid stub if it passes WP:NOT. Me what do u want? Your Hancock Please 01:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Austrian air conditioners? Ecoleetage (talk) 02:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Ecoleetage, please offer a rationale for deletion that has some relationship to policy. I don't follow your objection. --Dhartung | Talk 04:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Response Sorry for being vague, but I don't see how this article fits into Wikipedia's notability. It seems like an advertisement for Austrian air conditioners. Ecoleetage (talk) 09:11, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply The only question at issue here is whether it passes WP:CORP. If it has been covered by reliable sources, then it is notable for Wikipedia purposes. If it is indeed a "leading global manufacturer" (haven't verified that yet), it's certainly notable. --Dhartung | Talk 10:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep, probably improvable by a German speaking editor. There's coverage that isn't press releases. (I'm fascinated that the official company name is in English.) --Dhartung | Talk 04:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. A hard goods manufacturing business with some evidence of notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. "A company ... is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources." The article cites an article in WirtschaftsBlatt. What else do we need? Lars T. (talk) 18:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.