- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:41, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- AIC Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article lacks sufficient independent, reliable sources (e.g., reputable news, academic coverage) to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG, relying on limited promotional material AndesExplorer (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Canada. AndesExplorer (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment AndesExplorer: per WP:BEFORE, what is your assessment of the abundant Google Books results for this company? --MarioGom (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Minimal source very insufficient to establish notability, source looks like a PR not having music coverage on the article Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 02:00, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.