- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete by consensus. Kimchi.sg 07:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Converting prod to AFD as previously deleted by prod and restored so doesn't qualify. Huon nominated it as "Non-notable, fails WP:WEB, no relevant Google hits". JLaTondre 00:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. SNOWball this please. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 00:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with JLaTondre...this just need to be snowballed since it doesn't meet the criteria of WP:CSD#A7. --Bill (who is cool!) 00:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete if it was restored for useless vanity a second time... — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 02:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-encyclopedic vanity --Xrblsnggt 03:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per CSD-G4, also fails WP:ORG and WP:VAIN. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per above. -- H·G (words/works) 06:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per above. SynergeticMaggot 06:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.