Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AN/MPN-14K Mobile Ground Approach System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to AN/MPN. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AN/MPN-14K Mobile Ground Approach System

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

AN/MPN-14K Mobile Ground Approach System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The AN/MPN-14K is a modified AN/MPN-14 which is fully described in the article AN/MPN. There is a wikilink to the -14K article within the AN/MPN article which is wholly unnecessary since the -14K article does not meet general notability and the -14K article has no citations at all. I recommend the -14K article be deleted (merge unnecessary). — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 20:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Technology, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:17, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: When a merge is "unnecessary", the title gets redirected to the main article. Someone searching the topic with the -14K included will then be brought to that page, instead of being left thinking that Wikipedia does not cover the topic. This discussion did not really need to be brought up; the redirection of the page could simply have been done. I'm just sitting here, watching the wheels go round and round... (talk) 18:12, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect as the subject seems to largely replicate the subject covered by AN/MPN. Not seeing a case for independent notability or any merging. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.