Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/APO Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

APO Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

APO Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Usual PR stuff. None of the cited sources are reliable, in-depth enough to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Jsfodness (talk) 19:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Companies, Africa, Middle East, and Switzerland. Shellwood (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete whenever I read Africa related article and look for sources sometimes, if I see their name, I sort of know it’s not WP:INDEPENDENT. Looking at their own article and news they have put, they are also not notable and doesn’t suffice WP:CORPDEPTH. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.