Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARGuing for Multilingual Motivation in Web 2.0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation of the article when references appear/are published/etc Tone 15:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ARGuing for Multilingual Motivation in Web 2.0

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable project. I have searched for reliable sources to establish the subject's notability but have been unable to find any. Cunard (talk) 04:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While I can understand the doubts about the notability of this article, please understand that sufficient references to the project will not be available till after the conference on Game based learning as mentioned in the article. Within the ARGs in education this project is a global first in targeting language education. I would be grateful for patience regarding this article. After the conference and presented papers have been referenced within the article, and if the article is still considered not sufficiently Notable, I will cease my arguments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acerview54 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CRYSTAL. Cunard (talk) 05:35, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Its never a good sign when the references section includes a plea to keep an article based on promises to improve refs at some future date. Thats a sure indicator that an article was created before its time and whats there today is likely original research There is no deadline, this article can be recreated later once sufficient material to draw information for a good article is available. RadioFan (talk) 12:24, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per the creator. Joe Chill (talk) 13:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; per nomination. Not every research paper gets a separate encyclopedia article, and this not-yet-published does not appear to be notable enough at the present. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk)
Delete per RadioFan. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:35, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please may I ask if the contributors who are asking to delete this are familiar with 2 areas:
1. The European Union Lifelong learning education programme from were this game has been funded
2. The problems and potential for games and ARGs usage in education that this project has made a global contribution to furthering?

I believe these are fair questions, as only a clear understanding of these points will permit an understanding of the notability of the article.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.