Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASD Learning Ltd
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 08:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- ASD Learning Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Private, for-profit, special needs school. Searches provide no sources to support notability per WP:ORG, hence the article is little more than a directory entry , and thus promotional. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:CORP. No significant coverage in secondary sources. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:38, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:15, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:15, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non notable. Lacks enough reliable sources covering the subject. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 05:38, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No third-party reliable sources given. Would have !voted to keep if it was a "normal" school or a non-profit organisation. smtchahal(talk) 06:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable 3rd party sources located; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - Fails WP:CORP & WP:RS. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 12:52, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.