- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ASLinux Desktop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Low-quality article on poorly notable dead Linux distribution. The homepage confirms the article on "According to its ife cycle policy (12 months), next version will be published in May 2006." ("Con esta versión se establece una nueva política en los ciclos de vida (12 meses)"). This would make the next release at least 14 months behind schedule and the homepage wasn't updated since at least a year. I can't see how a distribution which was new when it died could come back to life after about 2 years, particularly since it was created when Debian was in a much worst situation on the desktop. Nevertheless, 80 000 preliminary Google hits show that the distro had *some* notability. Still, I realized it has only 160 non-ignored results (see http://www.google.fr/search?q=ASLinux+-wikipedia&hl=fr&start=170&sa=N). That's very little for a Linux distro. Chealer 00:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not every distro is notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Dennis, and ghits aren't notability. This is like having an article on a stillborn child --Longing.... 12:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.