- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus is slight with only two opinions. It would improve the article if some of the info Lquilter found could be incorporated. I'll try to add one or two sources. Pigman☿ 05:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While no doubt a very noble organization, the article claims notability (sortof) but doesn't establish it with any sources. If adequate sourcing that proves notability can be provided I will withdraw nomination. Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk|@ 20:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 21:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 21:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:ORG. Longevity of the organization -- the organization is almost 50 years old and has spawned numerous organizations around the country, including a national organization. It was also a litigant in a major public school education lawsuit in the early 1970s. Google news, google scholar, and even google books show numerous cites. --Lquilter (talk) 14:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Lquilter. Sting au Buzz Me... 04:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.