- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:34, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ATOMac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unreferenced for over a year. Can't find any good sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I haven't found any relevant sources to a software product despite searching with Google News and Books. The article never mentions a release date but it's likely that it was never formally announced or never received any news coverage. SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unable to find evidence that the subject satisfies WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT. Gongshow Talk 20:30, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable 3rd party references to establish notability of this software. Created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 09:30, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.