Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVSystem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AVSystem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources to affirm the notablility of the company. Only company webpages and various PR stuff. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - AVSystem is listed in numerous independend sources, including:

- http://openmobilealliance.org/oma-releases-results-of-lwm2m-testfest-and-opens-next-testfest-registration/ - Article published by Open Mobile Alliance - Leading Industry Forum for Developing Market Driven-Interoperable Mobile Service Enablers due to AVSystem's participation in OMA-TestFest 2015.

-https://tr069.wordpress.com/2015/03/17/avsystem-opens-a-representation-in-latin-america/ - Until Spring 2015, TR-069 Central Blog, run by Max Weltz, was one of the leading information sources according to Telecommunication and TR-069 Management World.

- http://www.computerworld.pl/news/351021/ENFACE.Slawomir.Wolf.html - Interview with Company's CEO Sławomir Wolf, run by well-known magazine Computer World

- http://www.fibaro.com/pl/node/4086 - Summary of Cooperation with Fibaro Group, published on their corporate website by Fibaro Group

AVSystem's notability can be confirmed by its presence at numerous Technology Events, including:

- Mobile World Congress, the world’s largest gathering for the mobile industry, organised by the GSMA (representing the interests of mobile operators worldwide, uniting nearly 800 operators with more than 250 companies in the broader mobile ecosystem, including handset and device makers, software companies, equipment providers and Internet companies, as well as organisations in adjacent industry sectors.) https://www.mobileworldcongress.com/exhibitor/avsystem/

- Communic Asia - an information and communications technology (ICT) exhibition and conference held in Singapore.http://www.communicasia.com/2016/exhibition/list-of-exhibitors/

- Broadband World Forum - The recognised annual meeting for industry leaders in broadband - https://tmt.knect365.com/bbwf/sponsors/avsystem

- TM Forum Live - http://www.tmforumlive.org/get-involved/sponsor-exhibit/

- LTE Series Events - LTE MENA, LTE North America - https://mena.lteconference.com/company/avsystem/ ; https://americas.lteconference.com/company/avsystem/

- Small Cells Conference, London - http://www.scwsworld.com/exhibitors/avsystem

- 5G World Summit - https://5gworldevent.com/company/avsystem/

AVSystem is one of few companies around the world dealing with the industry of device management (source: https://tr069.wordpress.com/2012/10/02/vendors-in-numbers/, 2012). The company has a national coverage cooperating with companies know world-wide (source: https://www.avsystem.com/testimonials/)

In 2015 and 2016 AVSystem was shortlisted during LTE MENA Awards, LTE World Summit and LTE LATAM Awards in the categories of: Best Innovation in HetNet Development,Best HetNet Solution, among companies such as Ericsson, Huawei, ZTE, Spider Cloud & Cisco (source: https://www.avsystem.com/category/news/; https://latam.lteconference.com/lte-sdn-awards-2016-nominees/)

Section about AVSystem's engagement worldwide can be added immediatelyJakub Widomski (talk) 13:10, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I second tagging for deletion - notoriety is questionable, article is orphaned, sources are for conferences (participation in which would have probably been bought) not from reputable news networks, etc. that would help to confirm the company is well known. Best, Nicnote (talk) 15:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as per http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/9/prweb8813233.htm User:Jakub Widomski seems to be an employee at AVSystem - having written the PR statement? Nicnote (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of independent sources, and if they exist I doubt I will find them in the US-based search engines that I have access to. This is a new user, and quite likely without knowledge of @en Wikipedia's policies on conflict of interest, reliable sources, or notability. I have placed COI information on the user's talk page. If this had come through AfC we might have been able to head it off. Jakub Widomski - it isn't because there isn't proof of international engagement. You need to read WP:RS on reliable sources. You cannot use the company's own content, nor blogs, to support the article. Having a logo redesign is not going to support notability. The criteria for companies are at WP:CORP. You need to understand all of these things to create a viable article. LaMona (talk) 01:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I frankly would've speedied as this is G11 material through and through, containing advertorial information; the sources are nowhere nearly at all convincing so all of this together is certainly enough to delete. SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, there is an external relation with the company which might cause COI. Unfortunatelly, in case of such specialised area of activites, only the person involved with the company (as a worker, customer or partner) could deliver such a specific set of info and details about its history, products, etc. Nonetheless I believe my general understanding of notability was not fully correct in that case, and I will not try to force keeping the article. For future publications, I will gather more reliable secondary sources to prove reliability and notability of the topic. Thank you all for your involvement in my case. Jakub Widomski (talk) 14:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.