Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AWS Truepower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Of note is that promotional content and tone can be removed by copy editing the article. As per this discussion, adding a {{Cleanup AfD}} template to the page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AWS Truepower

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG, reads like an advert with no third party citations JMHamo (talk) 02:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:ADMASQ. Pax 06:38, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Plenty of third-party coverage online, here's a sampling: [1] [2]/[3] [4] [5] [6]. Current problems on the page are surmountable, since spammy prose is easy to fix. You just, like...hit delete and save. (mindblowing) Earflaps (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:ADMASQ. Above-mentioned third-party coverage is not enough. From this sources first and fifth are reprints of the press releases and other sources (except the last one) only mentioning the company which is not enough for WP:GNG nor WP:CORP. If there are really enough independent sources to satisfy WP:CORP, it would be better to recreate this article from the scratches. Beagel (talk) 09:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All of the sources in the article seem to be from the company, and it is rather promotional in tone. However, there is a good deal of third-party coverage. Looking only at Google News turned up these, which are are all solid news stories, not press releases.
- [7] North American Windpower: Are Fitch Ratings' Claims About Wind Farm Underperformance Unfounded?
- [8] Measuring the Wind and the Sun : Greentech Media
- [9] Change in wind hurts future - Times Union
- [10] Waning Wind | EnergyBiz
- [11] Cherokee Chronicle Times: Local News: The art of building utility-scale wind farms (01/27/14)

These say enough about the wind forecasting business to write a decent article. A quote from the second one: '"We're the leading provider of wind forecasts in North America to ISOs and utilities and provide assessment services to all of the major wind and solar developers throughout the world," was as specific as AWS Truepower would be.' – Margin1522 (talk) 10:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - added in the ones you found. Earflaps (talk) 18:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.