- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was BJAODN. - Mailer Diablo 05:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page isappears to be an obvious joke, hinting to considering the AD/CE squabbling on Wikipedia.
- Send to WP:BJAODN, per nomination. squell 16:55, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I may be wrong in assuming it to be an intentional joke: Google — squell 20:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN --Pboyd04 17:01, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN for sure. One of the better ones :-) Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 17:50, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN, per nom.--SarekOfVulcan 18:15, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN per nom. Ajwebb 18:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN! I actually like this a lot. Snurks T C 19:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and BJAODN. --Quarl 21:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- DNAOBJ, wait, that sounds disgusting :Sceptre(Talk) 23:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.