- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC) ===AZBox HD===WHY DELETE?[reply]
- AZBox HD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable product. No indications of significant coverage in any media. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:30, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, maybe? I quickly found a number of 3rd party reviews and articles for this product, like this one, this one, and this one (same site as the last). Given that the product is from Portugal and sold primarily there and Brazil, I suspect that even this much english coverage would be an argument for N. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:51, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom as spam. Not worthy enough for its own article. --みんな空の下 (トーク | I wanna chAngE!) 07:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.