Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Bold Leap Forward
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A Bold Leap Forward (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL. Show has been "in development" for five years. No indication that it will be moving forward any time soon. Article is "sourced" by a blog interview from someone the article says is no longer connected to the hypothetical project and a petition site. Should the show actually go into production, no prejudice to the article's being recreated. Otto4711 12:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As crystalballism. Source is a fan site, not a reliable source. DarkAudit 12:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per nom. A note on the parent article is all this needs at most. --Plumbago 13:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom and everyone else. Agree with the note on the parent article. Plm209(talk to me • contribs) 14:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. In development for five years? That's not much of a bold leap forward, is it? (edited) --Charlene 13:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom., and all. --JayJasper 21:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.