Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Foundling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Foundling

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

A Foundling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film. The director's article is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carly Lyn. SL93 (talk) 00:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 00:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:48, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I can't really find any substantial or mildly substantial coverage for this. It looks like it released and got some coverage from a couple of horror websites, but not really any that I'd be firmly comfortable using to show notability. I'll refrain from suggesting a redirect as this is something that looks like it would be a relatively common search term as far as films and literature goes. Plus I don't know if the director herself is notable at this point in time. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 01:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It looks like to me that clearly fails WP:NFILM, as ReaderofthePack said that only got coverage in few horror websites, but could not find the film on Rotten Tomatoes and, even the director herself was called into question. Sheldybett (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.