Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Guide to Human Conduct
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was WP:WITHDRAWN. (non-admin closure) Mkdwtalk 21:48, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- A Guide to Human Conduct (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- I withdraw my nomination as it seems the book is notable Shrikanthv (talk) 11:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
does not meet wiki notability Shrikanthv (talk) 23:29, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- article creator's comment: This book of Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar aka Shrii Shrii Anandamurti, written on 1957 and translated in various languages, is considered to be the ethical point of reference for many tantra and yoga praticioners. It has a particular relevance for the rational explanation given by the author on Yama and Niyama and other principles as foundations of the intuitional practices (Sadhana).--Cornelius383 (talk) 14:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This book meets the WP notability criteria on three grounds: (3) The book has been considered by reliable sources to have made a significant contribution to a notable motion picture, or other art form, or event or political or religious movement. (4) The book is the subject of instruction at multiple elementary schools, secondary schools, colleges/universities or post-graduate programs in any particular country. (5) The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable. --Abhidevananda (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.