Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A non Entity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A non Entity

A non Entity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this novel or its author are notable. A two-line announcement in the Hindustan Times seems to be the only reliable independent source giving any attention to this book. Amazon reviews or a text on a blog where the author is a contributor (gyandarbar) don't add any notability.

Also nominated: Agam Anand Fram (talk) 10:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NOW THIS page should not be deleted.

please send reason . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okbabby (talk • contribs) 18:17, 17 December 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The Hindustan Times is too brief to show notability and the only one that looks like it might be usable is this bit in a paper. That by itself isn't enough to show notability and I was unable to find anything else that would show notability. Reviews on Amazon, SPS, or other unusable links cannot show notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Hardly even much to suggest a minimally acceptable article yet. SwisterTwister talk 08:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.