- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 01:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- A straight path (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The book fails the notability guidelines. Wikipedia:Notability (books) ♦ Tentinator ♦ 17:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Self-published debut novel with no signs of notability. No reviews in significant independent sources. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:17, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per above. Also, almost all of article is a straight copvio of the from Harper Collins write up plus only references are to Amazon.com. Star767 21:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. I wasn't able to find anything to show that this book passes notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.