- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert T | @ | C 04:52, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
nn people spam. Also created by a user just warned for vandalism (and blocked for it previously Ian 13 18:21, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ian 13 18:21, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete could easily go speedy as nonsense.--Isotope23 18:57, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete rubbish. And yes, speedy as nonsene if possible. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 19:18, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nonsense. *drew 01:39, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. crap --Rogerd 05:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this load of trash. I am Aadam and I find this offensive.
- The above was from IP 72.1.206.12 which is the same as the address that created the article. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 17:59, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unencyclopedic, nonsensical.Dakota t e 17:55, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.