Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aastha: In the Prison of Spring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Sodabottle's sources seal it for me, and no one other than the nominator has !voted "delete". Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aastha: In the Prison of Spring

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NOTFILM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oo7565 (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Jujutacular ^T · C 05:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Jujutacular ^T · C 05:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable film from a notable director. Just click the gnews/gbooks links at the top. Even after 13 years of its release, the film is viewed as some sort of standard for erotic / sex scenes in bollywood. The lead actress was nominated for a best actress award in the Screen-Videocon awards for her performance.--Sodabottle (talk) 05:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sodabottle. KuwarOnline ^Talk 08:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per excellent WP:AFTER by User:Sodabottle. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above commentsMark E (talk) 21:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – per comments by Sodabottle (talk · contribs). —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 16:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.