- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Abdullah Manaz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:PROF or WP:N. Books have very minimal worldcat holdings, no GScholar hits. GNews search finds a few passing mentions, but nothign which strikes me as significant ThaddeusB (talk) 00:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Also, it appears that Manaz is editing the article.--Sandor Clegane (talk) 17:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article does not match WP:N or WP:PROF also it appears to be a self-published article.Aadagger (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.