Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abortion: Opposing Viewpoints (2002)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abortion: Opposing Viewpoints (2002)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This book doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria set forth in Wikipedia:Notability (books). It consists mostly of reprints of various articles, and our article essentially just rehashes the table of contents. I don't see anything encyclopedic here, nor any way that this meets notability criteria, and it's been around for 5 years or so without improvement. MastCell ^Talk 16:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:NBOOK. The Opposing Viewpoints series list and everything on it are fine AFD subjects IMHO although I'm inclined to see if a consensus develops here first. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 22:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.