- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete (CSD G1). If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- About inventors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article is an unnecessary fork of Inventor. John254 00:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't this fit some speedy criterion? -Amarkov moo! 00:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Cool Bluetalk to me 00:53, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- In answer to Amarkov, yes. Speedy Delete G1, it's utter nonsense. So tagged. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yes, it's utter nonsense. And an un-needed fork. Alex43223 T | C | E 01:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete What's the point of it? Inventors states things about them. --Lemonflash|(speak out) 01:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Poorly written. BuickCenturydriver (Honk, contribs) 01:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Absolute pointless nonsense. Sahmeditor 01:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Tayquan hollaMy work 02:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.